<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - ERROR: Unhandled web process message 'StorageAreaMap:DispatchStorageEvent'"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150315#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - ERROR: Unhandled web process message 'StorageAreaMap:DispatchStorageEvent'"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150315">bug 150315</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:cgarcia@igalia.com" title="Carlos Garcia Campos <cgarcia@igalia.com>"> <span class="fn">Carlos Garcia Campos</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Yes, I didn't take into account that now we can have session storage maps without a listener when the connection is closed and destroyStorageMap() hasn't been called. We could either simply change the ASSERT to something like
ASSERT(isSessionStporage() || m_eventListeners.contains(std::make_pair(&connection, storageMapID)));
or add checks to processDidCloseConnection() and applicationWillTerminate() in case of session storage to not call removeListener if the listener is not present. Since HashMap handles the case of removing a non exiting item, I think it's simpler and probably more efficient to change the assert. Although, it's true that it wouldn't catch valid cases of session storage maps that should have a listener at that point. What do you guys think?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>