<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [GTK] Doesn't handle base64 encoded web fonts?"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147296#c8">Comment # 8</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_REOPENED "
title="REOPENED - [GTK] Doesn't handle base64 encoded web fonts?"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147296">bug 147296</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:mcatanzaro@igalia.com" title="Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@igalia.com>"> <span class="fn">Michael Catanzaro</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>I guess with #2 we'll probably have more problems and bug reports, and eventually a larger quirks list, since we are way more similar to Safari than to Chromium. But I really have no way to know, so I won't oppose that change.
But I half think we should just give up on pretending to be other browsers: do something minimal like "Mozilla/5.0 ($DISTRO; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/601.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Epiphany/3.16.2" and maybe even remove the quirks list....</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>