<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Critical warnings when loading YouTube videos"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146999#c5">Comment # 5</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Critical warnings when loading YouTube videos"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146999">bug 146999</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:pnormand@igalia.com" title="Philippe Normand <pnormand@igalia.com>"> <span class="fn">Philippe Normand</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=146999#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> Indeed, thanks Philippe:
>
> $ gst-inspect-1.0 autoaudiosink
> No such element or plugin 'autoaudiosink'
>
> Looks like the problem is that we do not depend on gst-plugins-good in GNOME
> jhbuild, only on gst-plugins-base. Also, our CMake build system clearly does
> not require it. Is gst-plugins-good mandatory, then? Should we require it at
> build time, or allow building without it and handle the failure better
> runtime?</span >
I don't think we should require it in CMake, -good doesn't provide any library, only plugins. But we should provide better runtime support indeed, handle failures better, like you suggest :)</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>