<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [WinCairo] Compile error, WebEditorClient::didApplyStyle() should not have any parameters."
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146450#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [WinCairo] Compile error, WebEditorClient::didApplyStyle() should not have any parameters."
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146450">bug 146450</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:peavo@outlook.com" title="peavo@outlook.com">peavo@outlook.com</a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=146450#c8">comment #8</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=146450#c3">comment #3</a>)
> > I seem to remember there was an
> > agreement not to add the override keyword when overriding pure virtual
> > methods?
>
> This is the first I have heard of this. I think we should definitely use
> override in cases like that and I’d like to know more about why we wouldn’t.</span >
Ok, sorry for spreading false rumours. I thought I picked this up somewhere, but I am probably wrong.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>