<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - stress/int8-repeat-out-of-bounds.js and stress/float32-repeat-out-of-bounds.js fail with eager compilation"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - stress/int8-repeat-out-of-bounds.js and stress/float32-repeat-out-of-bounds.js fail with eager compilation"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915">bug 144915</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:basile_clement@apple.com" title="Basile Clement <basile_clement@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Basile Clement</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144915#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> It's intentional. :-). The tests are asserting that we converge quickly and
> don't recompile too much. But with eager compilation, we will recompile more
> because we often don't get enough profiling in the first round. That's fine.
> I don't think we should try to make these tests pass in eager mode</span >
OK, it just seemed weird that we had tests that would only succeed provided some options are within presupposed range, closing this then.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>