<html>
    <head>
      <base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
    </head>
    <body>
      <p>
        <div>
            <b><a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - stress/int8-repeat-out-of-bounds.js and stress/float32-repeat-out-of-bounds.js fail with eager compilation"
   href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915#c2">Comment # 2</a>
              on <a class="bz_bug_link 
          bz_status_NEW "
   title="NEW - stress/int8-repeat-out-of-bounds.js and stress/float32-repeat-out-of-bounds.js fail with eager compilation"
   href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144915">bug 144915</a>
              from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:fpizlo&#64;apple.com" title="Filip Pizlo &lt;fpizlo&#64;apple.com&gt;"> <span class="fn">Filip Pizlo</span></a>
</span></b>
        <pre>It's intentional. :-). The tests are asserting that we converge quickly and don't recompile too much. But with eager compilation, we will recompile more because we often don't get enough profiling in the first round. That's fine. I don't think we should try to make these tests pass in eager mode</pre>
        </div>
      </p>
      <hr>
      <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
      
      <ul>
          <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
      </ul>
    </body>
</html>