<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Media Controls stop update after hovering for a few seconds"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144770#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Media Controls stop update after hovering for a few seconds"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144770">bug 144770</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:roger_fong@apple.com" title="Roger Fong <roger_fong@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Roger Fong</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144770#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144770#c3">comment #3</a>)
> > Are we regressing <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - [Media] Reduce style updates (painting) in controls"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=137763">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137763</a> on purpose?
>
> Yes. That patch caused a number of behavior regressions which require
> workarounds whose implementations negate the benefits of that patch.
>
> If we want to reduce unnecessary painting, we should make sure instead that
> the hidden controls do not have renderers.</span >
Right now we just opacity 0 the controls.
I'm not sure why would be be doing extra painting when opacity is 0 but if so, then we could go a step further and display:none the controls after the transition animation has ended.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>