<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [GTK] WTR doesn't correctly handle the Escape key"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144788#c9">Comment # 9</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - [GTK] WTR doesn't correctly handle the Escape key"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144788">bug 144788</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:cgarcia@igalia.com" title="Carlos Garcia Campos <cgarcia@igalia.com>"> <span class="fn">Carlos Garcia Campos</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144788#c7">comment #7</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144788#c4">comment #4</a>)
> > (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144788#c3">comment #3</a>)
> > > Once my original patch lands, I can run layout tests with this patch as well
> > > and report back.
> >
> > Ideally, this patch blocks #40601, because with this, your patch might be
> > reduced to a one line :-)
>
> I spent quite a few tedious hours running the tests and generating results,
> so I'd much prefer to just land my original patch and then go back and
> improve it later. It will be simpler for me and I won't have to worry about
> going down a rat hole. I promise that I will try out your escape key
> approach, which looks promising and propose another patch if it works.</span >
I don't like that patch that much, TBH. I won't oppose it if there isn't a better alternative, though.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>