<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.webkit.org/" />
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Don't de-allocate FunctionRareData"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144000#c14">Comment # 14</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Don't de-allocate FunctionRareData"
href="https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144000">bug 144000</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:basile_clement@apple.com" title="Basile Clement <basile_clement@apple.com>"> <span class="fn">Basile Clement</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144000#c13">comment #13</a>)
<span class="quote">> (In reply to <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144000#c12">comment #12</a>)
> > Comment on <span class=""><a href="attachment.cgi?id=251291&action=diff" name="attach_251291" title="Hopefully well-formed...">attachment 251291</a> <a href="attachment.cgi?id=251291&action=edit" title="Hopefully well-formed...">[details]</a></span>
> > Hopefully well-formed...
> >
> > so, ByteCodeParser was already right?
>
> This change should be transparent for ByteCodeParser.
> It is already handling the case where the allocation structure may be empty
> from <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED FIXED - Remove AllocationProfileWatchpoint node"
href="show_bug.cgi?id=143999">https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143999</a> .</span >
I do agree that the corresponding changes have probably been put on the wrong patch however...</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>