[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 248525] Meta tag for Tests with Empty & Single Empty Line Expectation Files

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248525

Alexey Proskuryakov <ap at webkit.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX

--- Comment #1 from Alexey Proskuryakov <ap at webkit.org> ---
I don't think that we should do this. Having a second way to declare expectations will be forever confusing to engineers, and will complicate webkitpy code. It's better to only have one place to look at than multiple.

We do have a similar feature for test options, and the experience of having it is not great. The reason why we still have it is that there isn't an alternative way to set these test options. Notably, it's not using a <meta>, but custom syntax, because run-webkit-tests doesn't understand HTML.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20221130/652fff8e/attachment-0001.htm>