[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 237329] [XCBuild] Emit a discovered dependency file from offlineasm
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Wed Mar 2 08:12:48 PST 2022
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=237329
Keith Miller <keith_miller at apple.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #453560|review? |review-
Flags| |
--- Comment #8 from Keith Miller <keith_miller at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 453560
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=453560
Integrate offlineasm using build rules and emit a depfile r5
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=453560&action=review
> Source/JavaScriptCore/offlineasm/asm.rb:391
> +if FileTest.exist?(outputFlnm) and not $options[:depfile] or FileTest.exist?($options[:depfile])
Can we put parens here that way it's trivial to remember if this is: `FileTest.exist?(outputFlnm) and (not $options[:depfile] or FileTest.exist?($options[:depfile]))` vs `(FileTest.exist?(outputFlnm) and not $options[:depfile]) or FileTest.exist?($options[:depfile])`. I also think it's wrong without the parens anyway (IIRC, this is the latter).
> Source/JavaScriptCore/offlineasm/generate_offset_extractor.rb:78
> +if FileTest.exist?(outputFlnm) and not $options[:depfile] or FileTest.exist?($options[:depfile])
Ditto.
> Source/JavaScriptCore/offlineasm/generate_settings_extractor.rb:60
> +if FileTest.exist?(outputFlnm) and not $options[:depfile] or FileTest.exist?($options[:depfile])
Ditto.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20220302/aed5e877/attachment.htm>
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list