[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 76114] REGRESSION (r96257): Selection should be removed when a document is unloaded

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76114

Mehmet gelisin <mehmetgelisin at aol.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mehmetgelisin at aol.com

--- Comment #4 from Mehmet gelisin <mehmetgelisin at aol.com> ---
Does "fixed" mean that `Set-Cookie: name=value; SameSite=InvalidValue` is interpreted as `Set-Cookie: name=value;` http://www.iu-bloomington.com/  (which is what this bug is asking for)? Or as `Set-Cookie: name=value; SameSite=Strict` (which is what that Inspector patch does)? I'm hoping for the former. :)
 https://www.webb-dev.co.uk/ 
> Wait, I haven’t seen “None” before. If this does something other than
> nothing (i.e. implementer does not even need to parse ‘n’, ‘o’, ‘n’, ‘e’,
> then ^^^ is enough.
 https://waytowhatsnext.com/

`SameSite=None` is intended to be a no-op in the status quo. That is, it assumes the first interpretation of "fixed" above, wherein `SameSite=None` is equivalent to omitting the `SameSite` attribute entirely. http://www.acpirateradio.co.uk/ 

I'll paste in a little more context here from the thread you started elsewhere:
http://www.logoarts.co.uk/
"""
That document proposes that `SameSite=Lax` is a better default than we have today, and positions `None` as an explicit way of http://www.slipstone.co.uk/  opting into the status quo. `SameSite=None` should be a no-op based on the above PR, and it seemed like an elegant, http://embermanchester.uk/  backwards-compatible way of allowing developers to explicitly express their intent for a given cookie to be delivered cross-site. I talked about the general direction with folks at the recent HTTP Workshop, http://connstr.net/  and there seemed to be reasonable agreement that incrementally shifting cookes' defaults would be a good way to make progress.
http://joerg.li/ 
If Safari's able to change the underlying parsing behavior in the near future, this seems like a http://www.jopspeech.com/ path we can pursue. If not, we might need to introduce another attribute in order to get that behavior in a way that doesn't break in other browsers. http://www.wearelondonmade.com/
"""

> If there any other visible change then CFNetwork will http://www.compilatori.com/
> need to be involved and we need a radar, which you can create yourself
> assigned to the right place (I think) at http://www-look-4.com/ . Ehh, as I type
> this, I guess its not much work to CC the WebKit-radar-importer and then do
> a radar dance Internally

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20210911/7835a2fc/attachment-0001.htm>