[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 225861] Content Blocker: add a new action type - "scriptlet"

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=225861

--- Comment #2 from Andrey Meshkov <am at adguard.com> ---
(In reply to Maciej Stachowiak from comment #1)
> I know this is a lot to ask, but can you give some examples of cases where
> each of these top 5 script rules are used AdGuard or uBlock filters, ideally
> with some explanation of why the rules are necessary and how they accomplish
> their goal?

Got it, I'll get a list with some examples soon.

> Unlimited versions of these actions would defeat the security and privacy
> goals of Content Blockers, so we'd want to think about whether there are
> ways to achieve the same goal with narrower actions.

Could you please explain what possible threats you're seeing with them?

IMO, the only thing that *might* be problematic to an extent is `set-constant`, but with the limitation on possible values, the risk is minimal.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20210521/3fc09572/attachment.htm>