[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 219595] [WASM-References] Add support for type annotated select
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Mon Dec 14 17:58:27 PST 2020
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219595
Yusuke Suzuki <ysuzuki at apple.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #416143|review? |review-
Flags| |
--- Comment #7 from Yusuke Suzuki <ysuzuki at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 416143
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=416143
Patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=416143&action=review
> Source/JavaScriptCore/wasm/WasmFunctionParser.h:652
> + m_expressionStack.constructAndAppend(zero.type(), result);
Using immediates.targetType is better for future extension?
> Source/JavaScriptCore/wasm/wasm.json:48
> + "annotated_select": { "category": "control", "value": 28, "return": ["prev"], "parameter": ["any", "prev", "bool"], "immediate": [{"name": "value_type", "type": "value_type"}], "description": "the same as just select but with a value type immediate" },
https://webassembly.github.io/reference-types/core/binary/instructions.html#parametric-instructions is showing ` ∗:()`, but it looks like this definition is not that one.
Can you fix it? br_table's definition would be useful to fix it.
> JSTests/wasm/wasm.json:48
> + "annotated_select": { "category": "control", "value": 28, "return": ["prev"], "parameter": ["any", "prev", "bool"], "immediate": [{"name": "value_type", "type": "value_type"}], "description": "the same as just select but with a value type immediate" },
Ditto.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20201215/bd68338d/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list