[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 177943] [GTK][WPE] Add API to configure and enable resource load statistics

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177943

--- Comment #13 from John Wilander <wilander at apple.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #12)
> (In reply to John Wilander from comment #11)
> > FWIW, I intend to rename ResourceLoadStatistics to
> > IntelligentTrackingPrevention or maybe just ITP for brevity. Just haven't
> > gotten around to it. I also hope to get rid of all or most of the
> > compile-time stuff.
> 
> In that case, maybe
> webkit_website_data_manager_set_intelligent_tracking_prevention_enabled()
> should be OK. What about the directory on disk, is "resourceloadstatistics"
> still a good name for the directory? Maybe "itp" would be a better name, in
> case it stores other stuff there in the future?
>  
> > As for the effects of turning on ITP, several of the things you mention
> > Michael, are Cocoa-implementations which need a non-Cocoa counterpart to
> > work. Cookie blocking and referrer downgrades are such examples.
> 
> Hm, if we know what needs implemented for soup ports, then we can implement.
> But we can't implement what we don't know needs implemented. :) So if you
> know of anything else besides these that you think we should look into, it
> would be great to know.

Except for HSTS (as explained above), it should all be covered by tests. Pass those and you should have all the platform-specific bits.

> That said, I assume Referer stripping and cookie blocking are both probably
> already implemented by Carlos's patches, because there should be layout
> tests that would fail otherwise, yes?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20200414/b7275d72/attachment.htm>