[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 194747] [MSE] SourceBuffer sample time increment vs. last frame duration check is broken

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=194747

--- Comment #14 from Jer Noble <jer.noble at apple.com> ---
(In reply to up from comment #13)
> Created attachment 362766 [details]
> Patch Rev1
> 
> @jer I have added a patch. Code only, so without test case files and change
> log yet. I will add more comments on the idea of the patch. Is this ok for
> now, or should I submit the complete patch already before review?

@up I think what you've done so far is fine. You can signal that your patch is ready for review by setting the "r?" flag on the attachment, but attaching "work in progress" patches like yours is perfectly acceptable. Next step is to force the EWS bots to try to apply, build, and test your patch. The EWS bots will automatically do so for any "r?" patch, but for "work in progress" patches, you have to do that manually by clicking the "Submit for EWS analysis" button next to the attachment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20190222/434c7353/attachment.html>