[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 188568] [GTK][WPE] Implement subprocess sandboxing

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188568

--- Comment #61 from Patrick Griffis <pgriffis at igalia.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #58)
> You have to get rid of the exit-time destructors somehow. This is one of my
> least-favorite things in C++. Tying the DBusProxy to the lifetime of the
> WebProcessPool seems like a good idea to me.
> 
> Well, almost. That leads to disaster (proxy running forever) if a
> WebProcessPool is ever leaked. I think the default WebProcessPool is
> actually leaked in this way, right? So maybe we can't do that.

Ok so it looks like Flatpak ties the lifetime of the proxy to a pipe between the processes, that would remove relying on destructors and just be more reliable in general.

I'm not sure the cleanest way to tie that to the processpool though.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20180919/d27a71d3/attachment-0001.html>