[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 188568] [GTK][WPE] Implement subprocess sandboxing

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188568

--- Comment #57 from Patrick Griffis <pgriffis at igalia.com> ---
(In reply to Carlos Garcia Campos from comment #56)
> > (In reply to Carlos Garcia Campos from comment #53)
> > > Ok, go it. Should we use NeverDestroyed then?
> > 
> > No, because then the proxy subprocess will never be killed when the UI
> > process quits.
> > 
> > That said, good catch, we have exit-time destructors here still. It will
> > need to be refactored to avoid that... somehow.
> 
> Shouldn't they be per web process pool instead of static to the UI process?

In practice I don't think it matters. The proxies would be the same so you just end up launching more than needed. The only benefit is if a pool with sandboxing was destroyed and then a new pool without sandboxing was made you would drop the unused processes.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20180919/1dac419b/attachment.html>