[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 190440] WebKit Inspector: Expose Server Timing Response Headers in Network Tab
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Fri Oct 12 15:53:23 PDT 2018
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190440
Devin Rousso <drousso at apple.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |drousso at apple.com
--- Comment #28 from Devin Rousso <drousso at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 352214
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=352214
Patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=352214&action=review
This is awesome! One thing to note is that you're missing a ChangeLog for the LayoutTests changes :(
> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Models/ServerTimingEntry.js:180
> + if (!this._durationSet) {
Is it necessary to prevent modification of this value once it's set? Typically, our style would be to `console.assert` for this, as it's more of a programmer's responsibility to control this.
> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Models/ServerTimingEntry.js:188
> + if (!this._descriptionSet) {
Ditto (180).
> Source/WebInspectorUI/UserInterface/Views/ResourceTimingBreakdownView.js:140
> + let {
I would prefer if you separated this onto two lines. The reason we destructured `timingData` is because it's just a plain object, whereas `timingData` is an actual getter. I don't think we should be destructuring our model objects.
let {startTime, redirectStart, redirectEnd, fetchStart, domainLookupStart, domainLookupEnd, connectStart, connectEnd, secureConnectionStart, requestStart, responseStart, responseEnd} = this._resource.timingData;
let serverTiming = this._resource.serverTiming;
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20181012/ff507f34/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list