[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 183517] Feature Request: Include IndexedDB into Storage Access API

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183517

--- Comment #5 from youenn fablet <youennf at gmail.com> ---
> * What happens to database instances that are already active when the a
> storage access request resolves?
> * If service workers are affected by partitioning too, what happens to the
> database connections that are active within a service worker?

Note that a service worker may be used to keep some state.
It might make sense to change the controlling service worker of such an iframe when using the storage access API.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20180312/9754cfdf/attachment.html>