[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 187003] Add support for WPT manifests

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187003

Frédéric Wang (:fredw) <fred.wang at free.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|Add support for WPT         |Add support for WPT
                   |expectation manifests       |manifests

--- Comment #5 from Frédéric Wang (:fredw) <fred.wang at free.fr> ---
(In reply to Frédéric Wang (:fredw) from comment #1)
> Some more references about expectation manifest:
> https://wptrunner.readthedocs.io/en/latest/expectation.html#expectation-
> manifests
> https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/tree/master/tools/
> wptrunner#expectation-data

I think I've been mixing up things, there are optional expectations manifests but there is also the generated MANIFEST.json ( https://wptrunner.readthedocs.io/en/latest/usage.html#id2 ). I think in most cases, just using MANIFEST.json will be enough to solve the issues we have with reftests.

(In reply to Ryosuke Niwa from comment #4)
> I don't think we should do this. There was a long discussion about it in
> webkit-dev. See
> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2011-November/018470.html

I wonder if this discussion is really up-to-date given Robert Ma's comment that Chromium finally decided to switch to WPT manifests instead of using the filename convention or link tags.

How do you plan to solve the issues with reftest import/export?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20180627/29b0a4a2/attachment-0001.html>