[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 179179] display:contents should work with dynamic table mutations

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Thu Nov 2 14:48:09 PDT 2017


--- Comment #4 from Ryosuke Niwa <rniwa at webkit.org> ---
(In reply to Antti Koivisto from comment #3)
> > I'd prefer using Parent& RenderTreeUpdater::renderingParent() instead since
> > -> syntax doesn't seem to buy us much.
> I have been using it in cases where it removes redundancy. This would
> otherwise need to be written as
> RenderTreeUpdater::Parent& RenderTreeUpdater::renderingParent()

I see. I guess it's fine but I really hate now that I have to look at left & right to see what the return type of a given function is :(

We should really use one or the other throughout.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20171102/73e91741/attachment.html>

More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list