[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 163559] New: calculateMemoryCacheSizes incorrectly pins cacheMaxDeadCapacity
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Mon Oct 17 13:04:23 PDT 2016
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163559
Bug ID: 163559
Summary: calculateMemoryCacheSizes incorrectly pins
cacheMaxDeadCapacity
Classification: Unclassified
Product: WebKit
Version: WebKit Nightly Build
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebKit2
Assignee: webkit-unassigned at lists.webkit.org
Reporter: krollin at apple.com
CC: akling at apple.com, cgarcia at igalia.com,
ggaren at apple.com, koivisto at iki.fi
WebKit2/Shared/CacheModel.cpp has the following:
// Object cache capacities (in bytes)
// (Testing indicates that value / MB depends heavily on content and
// browsing pattern. Even growth above 128MB can have substantial
// value / MB for some content / browsing patterns.)
if (memorySize >= 2048)
cacheTotalCapacity = 128 * MB;
else if (memorySize >= 1536)
cacheTotalCapacity = 96 * MB;
else if (memorySize >= 1024)
cacheTotalCapacity = 64 * MB;
else if (memorySize >= 512)
cacheTotalCapacity = 32 * MB;
cacheMinDeadCapacity = cacheTotalCapacity / 4;
cacheMaxDeadCapacity = cacheTotalCapacity / 2;
// This code is here to avoid a PLT regression. We can remove it if we
// can prove that the overall system gain would justify the regression.
cacheMaxDeadCapacity = std::max(24u, cacheMaxDeadCapacity);
That last line looks like it should use 24 * MB rather than just 24u. Geoff Garen wrote the original code. He says:
> Youâre right â that code is clearly wrong. Iâd suggest deleting it.
>
> Perhaps the code was right at one time but became wrong over time through refactoring.
>
> Anyway, the PLT it speaks of is an old PLT we donât run anymore, so we donât need to worry about it.
>
> It looks like this means that 512MB devices only get 16MB of dead object cache. Thatâs pretty small for todayâs internet â only one or two pages. Still, it might be appropriate, since 512MB is pretty small.
This change should probably be made by someone who knows the ins-and-outs of testing the effect of the change, so cc'ing the last few people who touched this file in case they are interested in taking it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20161017/f1c2b0ea/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list