[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 157379] New: We shouldn't crash if DFG AI proved that something was unreachable on one run but then decided not to prove it on another run

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Thu May 5 11:33:25 PDT 2016


https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157379

            Bug ID: 157379
           Summary: We shouldn't crash if DFG AI proved that something was
                    unreachable on one run but then decided not to prove
                    it on another run
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: WebKit
           Version: WebKit Nightly Build
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: JavaScriptCore
          Assignee: webkit-unassigned at lists.webkit.org
          Reporter: fpizlo at apple.com

Any run of DFG AI is a fixpoint that loosens the proof until it can't fine any more counterexamples to the proof.  It errs on the side of loosening proofs, i.e., on the side of proving fewer things.

We run this fixpoint multiple times since there are multiple points in the DFG optimization pipeline when we run DFG AI.  Each of those runs completes a fixpoint and produces the tightest proof it can that did not result in counterexamples being found.

It's possible that on run K of DFG AI, we prove some property, but on run K+1, we don't prove that property. The code could have changed between the two runs due to other phases. Other phases may modify the code in such a way that it's less amenable to AI's analysis. Our design allows this because DFG AI is not 100% precise. It defends itself from making unsound choices or running forever by sometimes punting on proving some property. It must be able to do this, and so therefore, it might sometimes prove fewer things on a later run.

Currently in trunk if the property that AI proves on run K but fails to prove on run K+1 is the reachability of a piece of code, then run K+1 will crash on an assertion at the Unreachable node. It will complain that it reached an Unreachable. But it might be reaching that Unreachable because it failed to prove that something earlier was always exiting. That's OK, see above.

So, we should remove the assertion that AI doesn't see Unreachable.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20160505/7023e814/attachment.html>


More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list