[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 140938] Refactor the code to handle missing va_end() call after va_start() in String::format

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Thu Jan 29 11:11:36 PST 2015


--- Comment #7 from Santosh Mahto <santoshbit2007 at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Comment on attachment 245539 [details]
> Patch
> View in context:
> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=245539&action=review
> > Source/WTF/ChangeLog:8
> > +        Moved va_start/va_end call to match  seperately.
> The correct spelling is "separately". Also, not sure if this comment adds
> anything of value on top of the title.
> Is there any known benefit, other than the code looking slightly more nicely
> (e.g. does that fix some platform)? It would be good to explain that in the
> bug for posterity if s

I updated the comment section.may be it make sense now a bit. sending it to land

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20150129/4b123cc3/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list