[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 141356] Use longer hashes for cache keys

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141356

Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #246209|review?                     |review+
              Flags|                            |

--- Comment #3 from Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 246209
  --> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=246209
patch2

View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=246209&action=review

> Source/WebKit2/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheCoders.cpp:179
> +    auto data64 = reinterpret_cast<const uint64_t*>(digest.data());

Do we really need to do this? It makes things endian-dependent for no good reason. Can’t we write these out as a stream of bytes instead of two 64-bit integers?

> Source/WebKit2/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheKey.cpp:77
> +    hashString(md5, m_method);
> +    hashString(md5, m_partition);
> +    hashString(md5, m_identifier);

It’s a little strange to hash the characters in these strings, but no string boundaries or lengths. I suppose it’s OK, though.

> Source/WebKit2/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheKey.cpp:86
> +    auto* data64 = reinterpret_cast<const uint64_t*>(m_hash.data());
> +    return String::format("%016llx%016llx", data64[0], data64[1]);

I suggest treating this as a sequence of 16 bytes, not do this endian-specific thing:

    return String::format("%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x%02x", data[0], ...)

Could use StringBuilder instead of String::format to avoid having to write it all out like this. It would be really easy to write a tiny function that adds a byte to a StringBuilder as hex.

> Source/WebKit2/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheKey.cpp:93
> +    auto* data64 = reinterpret_cast<uint64_t*>(hash.data());

Again, I don’t like this endian-dependent strategy here any more than elsewhere. We should do it a byte at a time.

> Source/WebKit2/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheStorageCocoa.mm:45
> +static const char* versionDirectoryPrefix = "Version ";

I think it’s slightly more efficient to use const char[] for these things instead of const char*. Also, if not switching to const char[] it should be const char* const since we want the pointers to be constants, not variables.

> Source/WebKit2/NetworkProcess/cache/NetworkCacheStorageCocoa.mm:122
> +    String versionSubdirectory = String(versionDirectoryPrefix) + String::number(NetworkCacheStorage::version);

No need to cast versionDirectoryPrefix to a String explicitly. Should just work without that.

I sure wish makeString or some other function could do this without allocating an intermediate string with String::number.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20150207/e0f6558a/attachment-0002.html>