[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 132735] New: WebKit computed/fitted image size differs from Blink and Gecko

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Fri May 9 03:23:06 PDT 2014


           Summary: WebKit computed/fitted image size differs from Blink
                    and Gecko
           Product: WebKit
           Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
          Platform: Macintosh Intel
               URL: http://www.roh.org.uk/events
        OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.9
            Status: NEW
          Severity: Normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: Layout and Rendering
        AssignedTo: webkit-unassigned at lists.webkit.org
        ReportedBy: nickshanks at nickshanks.com

The CSS is something like:
  max-width: 100%;
  height: auto;
And the container is some non-integral width smaller than the intrinsic image size (197×131).
(It may be possible to reduce this to just {width:157.9px;height:auto} though I haven't tried)

The event images on the linked page are sized as follows in a wide window:

Safari 7.0 (9537.71): 157 × 104
Chrome 34.0.1847.131: 158 × 105 (computed at 157.984 × 105.047)
Firefox 29.0: 158 × 105

It would appear that Chrome and Firefox are computing the height from the computed width, then snapping both width and height to the nearest whole pixel.

Safari seems to be rounding the width down (i.e. floor() not round()) then computing the height from the floored width. This ends up with safari being 1px shorter and narrower than the other two. Cannot test in IE. Opera ought to be the same as Chrome.

So to fix this, two changes need to be made:

1) Compute the height from the un-rounded width.
2) Round rather than floor the dimensions to the nearest pixel.

Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list