[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 127332] Shouldn't Failure expectation work for image-only failures?
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Tue Jan 21 17:59:30 PST 2014
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127332
--- Comment #2 from Dirk Pranke <dpranke at chromium.org> 2014-01-21 17:57:00 PST ---
There were discussions on this when we were talking about changing the syntax back in 6/12 (and then in 9/12 when the changes were landing).
The general theory (I think) was that if a test is failing the pixel results and starts failing the text results as well, that almost certainly is a regression that should be noticed (and, conversely, if a test is now only failing the pixel tests, that's an improvement that should be noticed). There was also the belief that this mattered more to the Chromium devs than others :).
Further, there were also debates as to whether reftests should be ImageOnlyFailure or just Failure. I don't think this one matters much one way or another.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list