[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 109332] EXT_sRGB needs implementation

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Fri Dec 5 00:49:51 PST 2014


https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109332

--- Comment #13 from Florian Bösch <pyalot at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> a) Extensions are only enabled after a call to getExtension() is made on the
> extension.
> This is not consistent with how the rest of WebKit's WebGL implementation
> treats WebGL extensions, which simply determines enabled-ness by looking at
> what the underlying GL implementation supports.

That's incorrect. A WebGL extension is only enabled and ready if getExtension has successfully completed on that WebGL context.

> b) The test makes a point that the EXT_SRGB format is not valid for frame
> buffer attachments. Checking frame buffer status on a frame buffer with an
> attachment that has an internal format of EXT_SRGB is expected to yield an
> INCOMPLETE FRAMEBUFFER STATUS.
> I've made this work appropriately, however, I cannot find in the specs
> anywhere why this has to be the case...

This is also incorrect. Attaching an sRGB format to a framebuffer is a valid and important use-case for sRGB.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20141205/1917a392/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list