[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 109332] EXT_sRGB needs implementation
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Thu Dec 4 17:37:31 PST 2014
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109332
Roger Fong <roger_fong at apple.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |roger_fong at apple.com
--- Comment #7 from Roger Fong <roger_fong at apple.com> ---
I have patch which exposes the implementation.
ext-sRGB.html passes.
A few things to note:
The test assumes
a) Extensions are only enabled after a call to getExtension() is made on the extension.
This is not consistent with how the rest of WebKit's WebGL implementation treats WebGL extensions, which simply determines enabled-ness by looking at what the underlying GL implementation supports.
b) The test makes a point that the EXT_SRGB format is not valid for frame buffer attachments. Checking frame buffer status on a frame buffer with an attachment that has an internal format of EXT_SRGB is expected to yield an INCOMPLETE FRAMEBUFFER STATUS.
I've made this work appropriately, however, I cannot find in the specs anywhere why this has to be the case...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20141205/083b794f/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list