[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 109332] EXT_sRGB needs implementation

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Thu Dec 4 17:37:31 PST 2014


https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109332

Roger Fong <roger_fong at apple.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |roger_fong at apple.com

--- Comment #7 from Roger Fong <roger_fong at apple.com> ---
I have  patch which exposes the implementation.
ext-sRGB.html passes.

A few things to note:
The test assumes

a) Extensions are only enabled after a call to getExtension() is made on the extension.
This is not consistent with how the rest of WebKit's WebGL implementation treats WebGL extensions, which simply determines enabled-ness by looking at what the underlying GL implementation supports.

b) The test makes a point that the EXT_SRGB format is not valid for frame buffer attachments. Checking frame buffer status on a frame buffer with an attachment that has an internal format of EXT_SRGB is expected to yield an INCOMPLETE FRAMEBUFFER STATUS.
I've made this work appropriately, however, I cannot find in the specs anywhere why this has to be the case...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-unassigned/attachments/20141205/083b794f/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list