[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 72584] Support Image Level 3's image() notation

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72584





--- Comment #54 from Dirk Schulze <krit at webkit.org>  2013-09-13 05:28:28 PST ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> (In reply to comment #52)
> > 
> > The CSS WG charta is clear about that. If a specification is in CR, it shall be (might even be a must) implemented without prefix.
> 
> Nope. The CSS WG's prefixing policy defines when UAs MAY ship an unprefixed version, but cannot constrain a UA from choosing to ship a prefixed version if, in that UA's view, the feature is immature.

I checked with Ted. The CSS WG has a wiki page where it is explicitly stated that the implemented MUST NOT implement a feature from a CSS specification in CR. [1]

However, this is a guidance and the Charter and official process do not define the usage of prefixes at all. [2]

[1] http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/vendor-prefixes#candidate-recommendation-features
[2] http://www.w3.org/Style/2011/CSS-process

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.