[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 120602] New: Interpolate between CSS filter() and cached images
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Mon Sep 2 07:05:29 PDT 2013
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120602
Summary: Interpolate between CSS filter() and cached images
Product: WebKit
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P2
Component: CSS
AssignedTo: webkit-unassigned at lists.webkit.org
ReportedBy: krit at webkit.org
CC: simon.fraser at apple.com, dino at apple.com,
thorton at apple.com
During a discussion with Simon on IRC, he mentioned that he would like to have an interpolation where the first entry is a cached-image and the second is a filter function with the same cached image as input (and the other way around).
As example:
from:
background-image: url(image.png);
to:
background-image: filter(url(image.png), blur(3px));
Right now, it is just possible to interpolate between two CSS images of the same type (as specified).
We should think about it more. Right now we just have url() as a cached or native image. According to the spec, url() should be replaced by image(). Image doesn't make it impossible to determine if the filtered image is the same as the cached image we want to animate to. The problem that I see is that people then will demand filter(gradient(), blur()) to gradient. And when we have that, the filter(cross-fade()) to filter(url()) or even filter(crossfade(url(image1), url(image2), 50%), blur(3px)) to image1.
Nothing is impossible, but we should keep the complexity of that in mind.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list