[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 110348] New: Web Inspector: CSSProperty.status defaults to "style" not "active"
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Wed Feb 20 07:27:37 PST 2013
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110348
Summary: Web Inspector: CSSProperty.status defaults to "style"
not "active"
Product: WebKit
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P2
Component: Web Inspector
AssignedTo: webkit-unassigned at lists.webkit.org
ReportedBy: timothy at apple.com
CC: keishi at webkit.org, pmuellr at yahoo.com,
joepeck at webkit.org, pfeldman at chromium.org,
yurys at chromium.org, apavlov at chromium.org,
loislo at chromium.org, vsevik at chromium.org,
web-inspector-bugs at googlegroups.com, graouts at apple.com
The code and the json file description disagree on what an absent "status" means.
Inspector.json:
{ "name": "status", "type": "string", "enum": ["active", "inactive", "disabled", "style"], "optional": true, "description": "The property status: \"active\" (implied if absent) if the property is effective in the style, \"inactive\" if the property is overridden by a same-named property in this style later on, \"disabled\" if the property is disabled by the user, \"style\" if the property is reported by the browser rather than by the CSS source parser." },
InspectorStyleSheet.cpp:
// Default "status" == "style".
if (status != TypeBuilder::CSS::CSSProperty::Status::Style)
property->setStatus(status);
Defaulting to "style" makes more sense to me, and the code agrees.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list