[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 101740] [Qt][ARM]REGRESSION(r133985): It broke the build

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101740





--- Comment #5 from Simon Hausmann <hausmann at webkit.org>  2012-11-09 06:35:26 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > (From update of attachment 173294 [details] [details])
> > View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=173294&action=review
> > 
> > > Source/JavaScriptCore/jit/JITPropertyAccess.cpp:355
> > > -template<IndexingType indexingShape>
> > > -JIT::JumpList JIT::emitGenericContiguousPutByVal(Instruction* currentInstruction, PatchableJump& badType)
> > > +JIT::JumpList JIT::emitGenericContiguousPutByVal(Instruction* currentInstruction, PatchableJump& badType, IndexingType indexingShape)
> > 
> > I think the goal if it being a template is to generate a faster implementation, i.e. indexingShape is a compile time constant instead of a variable at run-time that's on the stack.
> > 
> > So I don't think it should become a regular method.
> 
> I know the reason, but: 
> """Because templates are compiled when required, this forces a restriction for multi-file projects: the implementation (definition) of a template class or function must be in the same file as its declaration. That means that we cannot separate the interface in a separate header file, and that we must include both interface and implementation in any file that uses the templates."""
> 
> and also the GetByVal counterpart is implemented almost in the same way (and not with templates).

Hmm, isn't the template function called from JITPropertyAccess.cpp and also defined there?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.