[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 88134] New: new-run-webkit-tests should spin-up enough httpd processes to avoid timeouts
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Fri Jun 1 14:12:17 PDT 2012
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88134
Summary: new-run-webkit-tests should spin-up enough httpd
processes to avoid timeouts
Product: WebKit
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: Normal
Priority: P2
Component: Tools / Tests
AssignedTo: webkit-unassigned at lists.webkit.org
ReportedBy: fischman at chromium.org
CC: abarth at webkit.org, ojan at chromium.org
I noticed recently that on my z600/chromium/linux/16-core setup if I run a test (e.g. http/tests/media/video-buffered.html) with --iterations=100 (or 1000), the first 1-3 runs pass, then the next 13-15 runs timeout, and then the rest pass. If I bump the {{Min,Max}Spare},Start}Servers to 16 in http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/LayoutTests/http/conf/apache2-debian-httpd.conf then I get a 100% pass rate. My guess is that spinning up the new apache processes is eating too much of the test's timeout budget, but once they're spun up the test does fine.
Is there a reason not to always run with extra processes? (what's the minimum machine footprint n-r-w-t is expected to work on?)
IWBN if n-r-w-t could configure its httpd to run as many apache processes as DRT processes, but absent that kind of setup, would bumping the counts to 32 (or something else likely to be >= #cores on dev machines) be acceptable?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list