[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 75522] Enable IPP for FFTFrame

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Tue Jan 10 17:57:35 PST 2012


https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75522





--- Comment #14 from xingnan.wang at intel.com  2012-01-10 17:57:35 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Created an attachment (id=121794)
 --> (https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=121794&action=review) [details] [details]
> > Patch
> > 
> > Update the patch as the convolution layout test updated, new result:
> > Tests ConvolverNode processing a mono channel with mono impulse response.
> > 
> > On success, you will see a series of "PASS" messages, followed by "TEST COMPLETE".
> > 
> > PASS Initial latency of convolver is silent.
> > PASS Triangular portion of convolution is correct.
> > FAIL First part of tail of convolution is not sufficiently small: 0.00244140625 dB
> 
> This is way too large.  This corresponds to a max tail value of about 44100.  (0 dB = 1, relative to max of the triangle.)  The expected value should be less than -146 dB.  Something is messed up.  Perhaps the test is wrong?

I think the "tail1Max" of the updated patch is exactly the same as last patch, with the threshold value 0.002 in the old layout test which should be -53.98 dB ( 20*log10(0.002) ) in dB format. But in your updated layout test the value is down to -146.7 dB,  any reason to change the threshold value?

Also, the error output in your updated test script :
testFailed("First part of tail of convolution is not sufficiently small: " + tail1Max + " dB");
should it be
testFailed("First part of tail of convolution is not sufficiently small: " + tail1MaxDecibels+ " dB");
?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list