[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 78985] New: Web Inspector: Audit rules to recommend unprefixing now standard CSS properties
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Sat Feb 18 17:52:12 PST 2012
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78985
Summary: Web Inspector: Audit rules to recommend unprefixing
now standard CSS properties
Product: WebKit
Version: 528+ (Nightly build)
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: Normal
Priority: P2
Component: Web Inspector
AssignedTo: webkit-unassigned at lists.webkit.org
ReportedBy: joepeck at webkit.org
CC: timothy at apple.com, rik at webkit.org, keishi at webkit.org,
pmuellr at yahoo.com, joepeck at webkit.org,
pfeldman at chromium.org, yurys at chromium.org,
bweinstein at apple.com, apavlov at chromium.org,
loislo at chromium.org
I think it would be useful to have an audit rule that suggests unprefixing CSS properties if
the standard, unprefixed version, is now supported. I could see:
.rounded {
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
}
producing a warning like: (wording could use some work)
CSS: <a>foo.css:85</a> "-webkit-border-radius" is used, but "border-radius" is supported.
I would expect this to be smart enough to check the entire scope. Since having the prefix'd versions
might still exist in order to support legacy browsers. For example I would not expect a warning for:
.rounded-with-legacy-support {
-vender-border-radius: 5px;
-webkit-border-radius: 5px;
border-radius: 5px;
}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list