[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 64297] [Qt][WK2] Add the Web Inspector to WebKit2

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Wed Aug 24 10:18:27 PDT 2011


https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64297





--- Comment #40 from Alexis Menard <alexis.menard at openbossa.org>  2011-08-24 10:18:26 PST ---
(In reply to comment #39)
> Thanks for comment.
> 
> I'm waiting more then 2 weeks these API. Start work around to get working
> Web Inspector and unblock developers who needs working Web Inspector for Qt
> 
> I hope 
>            void BrowserView::toggleWebInspector()
> 
> shows what exactly one expects from these API

I think you really need to come to IRC to have a chat with us. You can reach us on freenode #qtwebkit and my nick is darktears.


"I'm waiting more then 2 weeks these API."

-> well I don't know what you mean but in WebKit2 and its Qt port is a moving target, making the WebInspector working is not our first priority when for example cookies are not working, downloads are not working, comboboxes are not working. The fact that you come and try to help on it is very welcome for sure.

In the other hand we can't accept workarounds in WebKit trunk, the code quality is meant to be the best possible. The patches you proposed are fine to keep them locally just to get the inspector working BUT the way they are today will be a no go for us. The trunk accepts clean stuff.

The last attachment you posted 104975 is a work in progress, I'm not even sure that thing compile at all.

I think you need to calm down, sit down, look at the design and rethink the entire solution. The fact that lot of people need the inspector (which we all agree is nice to have) doesn't mean you can rush the feature. They can live with a workaround in the meantime.

Now show up on IRC that will help.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list