[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 38918] add a FancyReviewQueue to upload r? patches to rietveld

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Wed May 12 19:29:13 PDT 2010


https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38918





--- Comment #11 from Ojan Vafai <ojan at chromium.org>  2010-05-12 19:29:12 PST ---
> > It's a little strange that we keep track of the "this patch is in rietveld" state twice: once in a bugzilla flag and again in AppEngine.  What if these get out of sync?  I think we only want to keep one copy of this information.
> 
> I agree it's a little strange, but we use this information to decide whether or not to show the the rietveld review UI in bugzilla. We considered having bugzilla ping appengine to see if the review existed, but that seemed janktastic. Ultimately, the bot will be running and uploading every patch to rietveld, so this flag will be obsoleted and we can get rid of it entirely. It's just an interim state to avoid showing the rietveld review UI on all patches until we can rely on the bot.

Actually, I take this back. I forgot that in-reitveld is a per-patch flag, but we only have one reitveld issue per bug. So we need in-rietveld to make it so we only show the rietveld review link for patches that have actually been posted to rietveld. Not sure how to get around this unless we kept a map of uploaded attachment IDs in rietveld, but that doesn't fix anything. It just changes where we store the bit, not that we store two bits. I'm open to suggestions.

I agree that the email sending is a problem. Is there anyway to get bugzilla not to send emails for some updates?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list