[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 38676] Web Inspector: make Web Inspector source code more "modular"

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38676





--- Comment #6 from Pavel Feldman <pfeldman at chromium.org>  2010-05-06 13:30:00 PST ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Keeping getters and setters is a hard requirement for me.
> 

I know.

> Why is a compiler needed?
> 

To minify the code and do the type checking if we get that far.

> Tell the compilers to get with the program.

Fair enough.

(In reply to comment #3)
> I've built such things in the past, with a bunch of different shapes.  I find
> these read better than all the boilerplate that folks typically use.  I also
> happen to dislike throwing all the prototype functions inside a literal object,
> so that you have to deal with commas between elements, etc.

Original code reads better for me. That's why I mentioned closure style - it
looks pretty much the same way as existing code + provides the tooling you are
talking about. But...

It is really easy to stuck at this point in the "choosing the right framework"
phase, so I'd suggest that we do it step by step, leaving existing code
structure in place and fighting dependencies as a start...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.