[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 35920] Test for referer information being stripped when the header is removed in willSendRequest

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35920


Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at chromium.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #50303|1                           |0
        is obsolete|                            |




--- Comment #8 from Jeremy Orlow <jorlow at chromium.org>  2010-03-09 07:38:32 PST ---
(From update of attachment 50303)
> diff --git a/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/no-referer.html b/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/no-referer.html
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..31e1625
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/no-referer.html
> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
> +<script>
> +if (window.layoutTestController) {
> +    layoutTestController.waitUntilDone();
> +    layoutTestController.dumpAsText();
> +    layoutTestController.setWillSendRequestClearHeader("Referer");
> +}
> +</script>
> +<div id=log></div>
> +<iframe src="http://127.0.0.1:8000/security/resources/no-referer-frame.php"></iframe>
> diff --git a/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/resources/no-referer-frame.php b/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/resources/no-referer-frame.php

Does this have to be done with an iframe?  Is it the normal way to do it?

> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f00b9bb
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/LayoutTests/http/tests/security/resources/no-referer-frame.php
> @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
> +<script>
> +function log(message)
> +{
> +    parent.document.getElementById("log").innerHTML += message + "<br>";
> +}
> +
> +if (document.referrer.toString() != "") {
> +  log("JavaScript: FAIL");
> +} else {
> +  log("JavaScript: PASS");
> +}

No {}'s



I don't know enough about DRT to r+ this, but it looks pretty solid to me.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.