[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 51134] Move loading related code from MemoryCache to CachedResourceLoader
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Fri Dec 17 01:39:55 PST 2010
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51134
--- Comment #5 from Antti Koivisto <koivisto at iki.fi> 2010-12-17 01:39:55 PST ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (From update of attachment 76761 [details])
> View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=76761&action=review
>
> Looks good to me, just a couple pedantic questions/comments.
>
> I'm going to refrain from r+ing to give other folks a chance to chime in, especially since I'm not very familiar with the MemoryCache piece of this.
>
> > WebCore/loader/cache/CachedResourceLoader.cpp:76
> > + default:
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + return 0;
>
> Should we have an ASSERT_NOT_REACHED() here?
Copy code but yeah, we should.
>
> > WebCore/loader/cache/CachedResourceLoader.cpp:259
> > - // FIXME: Consider letting the embedder block mixed content loads.
> > +
>
> I'm not really familiar with the mixed content policy code, is this FIXME not valid anymore?
That was removed by accident (I still don't know what it means).
>
> > WebCore/loader/cache/CachedResourceLoader.cpp:276
> > + if (!url.isValid())
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (!canRequest(type, url))
> > + return 0;
>
> Is there any particular reason to split this out into 2 if statements?
I thought a security check deserves a line of it's own. As the comment below says, this should merge with the other similar security check but I didn't want to change the existing behavior.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list