[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 50080] [Qt] Support a QNetworkAccessManager affined to a different thread.

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50080





--- Comment #6 from Jocelyn Turcotte <jocelyn.turcotte at nokia.com>  2010-12-09 02:14:17 PST ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (From update of attachment 74877 [details])
> The classes are very Qt specific so we should name them appropiate like QtNAMManipulator. Could we find a better name than manipulator?

Maybe QtNAMAccessor (can be weird since it translates to QtNetworkAccessManagerAccessor)
or QtThreadSafeNAM (it's not quite a NAM by itself though)
or QtThreadSafeNAMAccess
or QtNAMThreadBridge

Manipulator sounded the best, though it's normally used in a pejorative context. Do you have a favorite or other ideas?
Same thing for ReplyManipulator.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.