[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 47311] Add layout tests for Entry.getMetadata (FileSystem API)
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Tue Dec 7 18:28:48 PST 2010
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47311
--- Comment #7 from Kinuko Yasuda <kinuko at chromium.org> 2010-12-07 18:28:48 PST ---
(From update of attachment 71481)
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=71481&action=review
>> LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/op-tests-helper.js:223
>> + var entryMetadataString = 'this.environment["' + symbol + '"]';
>
> Might be better to make 'this.environment["' + symbol + '"]' a helper function in order to simplify the code.
Done.
>> LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/op-tests-helper.js:230
>> + this.errorCallback();
>
> Probably we should continue to run next test even we fail the current test unless we encounter a severe error that cannot be recoverable,
Done.
>> LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/op-tests-helper.js:232
>> + };
>
> '}' not aligned correctly.
Fixed.
>> LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/op-tests-helper.js:324
>> + };
>
> ditto.
Fixed.
>>>>> LayoutTests/fast/filesystem/resources/op-tests-helper.js:331
>>>>> + // Record rounded start date (current time minus 999 msec) here for the comparison. Entry.getMetadata() may return motd in seconds accuracy while new Date() is milliseconds accuracy.
>>>>
>>>> What is motd?
>>>
>>> Why would getMetadata be so inaccurate? Is that a filesystem limitation or part of our implementation?
>>
>> Ouch I think I meant mod time (last modification time). Will fix in the next patch.
>
> Well, there's no requirement that it be any more accurate than that. I was just curious.
Fixed the comment.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list