[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 37408] Break new-run-webkit-tests options into groups for easier re-use and possible relocation

bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Sun Apr 11 11:41:14 PDT 2010


--- Comment #5 from Dirk Pranke <dpranke at chromium.org>  2010-04-11 11:41:13 PST ---
(From update of attachment 53081)
Personally, I prefer options lists to be alphabetized, especially for the short
flags, but I can see what you're trying to do. Can you maybe at least
alphabetize in each group?

Down the road it might be good to have the groups share common prefixes in the
long flags, to make this clearer.

Also, if you are really brave, it was part of my original intent to pull some
options from the port object itself so, for example, Chromium-specific flags
would live in chromium.py, and not clutter up the main code. This would require
you to parse the flags in two passes, the first to figure out which port to
run, and then second to re-parse the flags with the generic list plus a list
pulled from the port. This would also address port-specific default values more

Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.

More information about the webkit-unassigned mailing list