[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 21271] Maxlength limits value
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Tue Sep 15 20:24:24 PDT 2009
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21271
--- Comment #16 from TAMURA, Kent <tkent at chromium.org> 2009-09-15 20:24:22 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> Better names would be ones that make it clear what the difference is between
> these two closely related functions. One is for user input and another is for
> values that don't come from user input. Perhaps sanitizeValue and
> sanitizeUserInputValue? Or constrainValue and constrainUserInputValue? These
> are not as elegant as your names, but they are clearer, and I think they would
> make the code easier to understand.
I renamed constrainValue() to sanitizeUserInputValue().
> > -// large. However, due to http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bugs.cgi?id=14536 things
> > +// large. However, due to http://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14536 things
>
> If you're going to fix the URL I also suggest making it https since http just
> redirects.
Done.
> > - // Renderer and our event handler are responsible for constraining values.
> > - ASSERT(value == inputElement->constrainValue(value) || inputElement->constrainValue(value).isEmpty());
>
> I'm a bit concerned about eliminating this assertion. Your change log doesn't
> give any explanation for why it's correct to remove it. Should we change the
> assertion to use sanitizeValue instead of constrainValue? Also, under what
> circumstances do we get a string that violates maxlength from the renderer?
Yeah, we should have assertion for sanitizeValue(), and
RenderTextControlSingleLine.subtreeHasChanged() should call sanitizeValue().
> > +String HTMLInputElement::sanitizeValue(const String& proposedValue) const
> > +{
> > + if (isTextField())
> > + return InputElement::sanitizeValue(this, proposedValue);
> > + return proposedValue;
> > +}
>
> Since InputElement::constrainValue already checks isTextField and does nothing
> if it is false, I do not think we need an additional check here. Lets keep this
> consistent with the existing constrainValue function, which does not add an
> isTextField check.
Right. This is redundant for now. I added it because we need to implement
sanitizing rules for non-text types.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the webkit-unassigned
mailing list