[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 25419] InspectorController refactoring proposal

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25419





------- Comment #3 from pfeldman at chromium.org  2009-04-28 22:50 PDT -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> I would encourage doing this a bit more piecemeal.  My preference would be to
> see the most important part, the proxy layer, added first, using the current
> API. Is there a reason the re-factoring needs to come before the proxy layer?  
> 

That is exactly the plan. The thing is that refactoring suggested in step (1)
is really small, but allows to narrow the proxy API significantly (proxy will
not need to support JS objects instantiation after it). Let me add a step 1.5
where explicit proxy interface is being defined that will encapsulate
serialization taking place in further steps. Is that what you are suggesting?

But in either case, proxy needs to operate serialized values and that is where
step (2) becomes necessary. Then one will need to dispatch serialized messages
and step (3) is a proposal on how it should be handled.

I would like to agree on the overall plan before I start doing anything. Beside
the high level agreement, I need things like a green light on adding 'value'
and JSON serialization.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.