[Webkit-unassigned] [Bug 16401] [GTK] GObject/C DOM binding

[bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org]

https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16401


adam at yorba.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Attachment #27762|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |




------- Comment #187 from adam at yorba.org  2009-04-21 17:06 PDT -------
Created an attachment (id=29670)
 --> (https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=29670&action=view)
patch updated to revision 42662

Here's a new patch, updated for the latest WebKit nightly build (revision
42662).  This patch contains no other changes since the last one posted (in
comment #182).

At this point I'm a bit perplexed as to what it will take to get this patch
accepted.  A little background: I work for Yorba, an open source group in San
Francisco.  We're working on (among other projects) a GTK-based WYSIWYG editor
built on WebKit, and we're highly interested in a GTK DOM since we need it for
our editor.  My colleague Jim and I picked up work on this patch back in
February, and submitted several successive iterations.  We got great feedback
from everyone until we posted our last version on March 6, but after that the
thread has essentially gone dead for the last six weeks.  I believe we've
resolved every significant issue that has been raised (though please correct me
if I'm wrong).  Who will ultimately make the decision about when this patch is
considered acceptable?  It would help us if that individual or set of
individuals could articulate what they're looking for.

We're willing to make substantial further changes if desired.  If the size of
the patch is an issue, we could potentially even carve it into smaller
iterations (for example, a first iteration could exclude exposing properties). 
We're also happy to come down to Cupertino to discuss in person if you're
interested - we could discuss over lunch or in front of a whiteboard.  As long
as the patch remains unaccepted, we'll plan to continue to keep it alive via
periodic postings here, though that certainly doesn't seem like the best
possible outcome.  Please let us know what more we can do - we're here to help!


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.webkit.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.