[webkit-reviews] review granted: [Bug 234405] Remove unneeded webkit specific CSS attribute for Image Control Menu. : [Attachment 448346] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Tue Jan 4 20:37:30 PST 2022
Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> has granted Megan Gardner
<megan_gardner at apple.com>'s request for review:
Bug 234405: Remove unneeded webkit specific CSS attribute for Image Control
Menu.
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=234405
Attachment 448346: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=448346&action=review
--- Comment #21 from Darin Adler <darin at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 448346
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=448346
Patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=448346&action=review
> Source/WebCore/html/HTMLImageElement.cpp:748
> +#endif // ENABLE(SERVICE_CONTROLS)
Should omit this comment here.
> Source/WebCore/html/shadow/mac/imageControlsMac.css:42
> - appearance: -internal-image-controls-button;
> + appearance: auto;
Should we remove this line entirely instead of changing it to say "auto"?
> Source/WebCore/platform/ThemeTypes.h:114
> + LargestControlPart = ImageControlsButtonPart
> +#else
> + LargestControlPart = CapsLockIndicatorPart
Can LargestControlPart be a constant outside the enumeration rather than an
enumeration value?
constexpr ControlPart largestControlPart = ImageControlsButtonPart;
It can otherwise be the same, still right here in the header next to the
enumeration.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderTheme.cpp:306
> +#endif
> Ref element = *elementPtr;
I suggest a blank line here.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderTheme.h:370
> + virtual bool isImageControl(const Element*) const { return false; }
This should take a const Element&, because it dereferences the pointer without
checking for nullptr.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/RenderThemeMac.mm:2321
> + if (ImageControlsMac::isImageControlsButtonElement(*elementPtr))
> + return true;
> + return false;
Should just be return x, rather than if (x) return true; return false;
> Source/WebCore/rendering/style/RenderStyle.h:1143
> + static_assert(LargestControlPart < 1 << APPEARANCE_BIT_WIDTH,
"Control part must fit in storage bits");
I suggest we just put this static_assert outside the functions, alongside them.
Since a static_assert works at runtime it does not need to be inside a
function.
> Source/WebCore/rendering/style/StyleRareNonInheritedData.h:69
> +#define APPEARANCE_BIT_WIDTH 7
This should be a constexpr integer, not a #define.
constexpr int appearanceBitWidth = 7;
> Source/WebCore/testing/Internals.cpp:6397
> +#endif // ENABLE(SERVICE_CONTROLS)
This endif doesn’t need a comment, it’s so close to the start of the #If.
> Source/WebCore/testing/Internals.h:1194
> +#endif // ENABLE(SERVICE_CONTROLS)
This endif doesn’t need a comment, it’s so close to the start of the #If.
> LayoutTests/ChangeLog:11
> + We need to move this test to be a mac specific one, as it now has
mac specific
> + test harnessing. Also changed the test to be resistent to the async
nature of adding
> + the shadow dom elements, and checking the shadow dom directly rather
than the resulting layout,
> + which is prone to pixel errors.
What makes this test Mac-specific?
> LayoutTests/fast/images/mac/image-controls-basic.html:32
> + if (internals.shadowRoot(elem) &&
internals.shadowRoot(elem).getElementById('image-controls') &&
internals.shadowRoot(elem).getElementById('image-controls-button'))
> + output += 'PASS: image controls exist in shadowDom';
> + else
> + output += 'FAIL: no image controls found in shadowDom';
> + document.getElementById('log').innerHTML = output;
Broken indentation here.
> LayoutTests/fast/images/mac/image-controls-basic.html:40
> + checkForShadowDom(elem);
And here.
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list