[webkit-reviews] review granted: [Bug 210882] Fix OSR exiting/iterator object checks in for-of bytecodes : [Attachment 397358] Patch
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
bugzilla-daemon at webkit.org
Thu Apr 23 11:08:16 PDT 2020
Saam Barati <sbarati at apple.com> has granted Keith Miller
<keith_miller at apple.com>'s request for review:
Bug 210882: Fix OSR exiting/iterator object checks in for-of bytecodes
https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210882
Attachment 397358: Patch
https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=397358&action=review
--- Comment #10 from Saam Barati <sbarati at apple.com> ---
Comment on attachment 397358
--> https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=397358
Patch
View in context: https://bugs.webkit.org/attachment.cgi?id=397358&action=review
r=me
> Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:19
> + Finally, this patch makes a small optimization where we just
ArithBitOr the
> + iterator's closed state (index == -1) and index is out of bounds. We
can't
Is this actually faster?
> Source/JavaScriptCore/ChangeLog:20
> + do a CompareBelow check because the index is effectively an int33_t.
int33 => int32_t
> Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGByteCodeParser.cpp:255
> - bool isDirect, unsigned intructionSize, ECMAMode);
> + bool isDirect, BytecodeIndex osrExitIndex, ECMAMode);
nice
> Source/JavaScriptCore/dfg/DFGByteCodeParser.cpp:6887
> + Node* doneIndex = jsConstant(jsNumber(-1));
same comment as your original patch: can we make this a constant somewhere and
use it by name? We hardcode -1 in a lot of places and it's not the best
abstraction
More information about the webkit-reviews
mailing list